Choosing the Right Supply Chain Planning Platform: It’s Not Just a Tech Stack, It’s a Strategy
Recently, Sanket Mishra asked a deceptively simple question: Which supply chain planning platform is right for you - Kinaxis, SAP IBP, Blue Yonder, or o9?
On the surface, the comparison is clean. He maps out key strengths:
Kinaxis: Real-time, Excel-like flexibility
SAP IBP: Deep S/4HANA integration
Blue Yonder: AI-driven, retail-focused
o9: Graph-based, unified UX
But the flood of feedback and responses revealed what the glossy vendor slides rarely tell you: choosing a planning platform is as much about internal capability, maturity, and context as it is about features.
Let’s unpack the debate.
Integration, Intelligence, or Illusion?
Warren Norris summed it up well: “We use SAP IBP because of the integration components.” That’s a common justification. If you're deep in the SAP ecosystem, IBP’s modular design and data model make sense. But Bret R. raised a red flag that should make any CIO pause - integration isn’t transformation if no one knows how to use the tool.
He warned: “When you go live, your help desk will be flooded. These apps are deep, and the knowledge required to run them cannot be built overnight.”
His advice? Don't go it alone. Rent AI-savvy experts or invest in training to bridge the knowledge chasm before go-live.
Key point: The most powerful planning platform is useless if your people don’t know how to prompt it, adapt it, or trust it.
Has Blue Yonder Shaken Off Its Legacy?
One of Sanket’s critiques was that Blue Yonder requires heavy customization. Jitender Vashisht pushed back, saying that’s outdated thinking. He cited the company’s Snowflake-powered Platform Data Cloud (PDC), claiming it simplifies integration by offering “a single, unified data touchpoint.”
That’s significant. If Blue Yonder is quietly solving its historic integration mess through a modern, scalable data layer, it may leapfrog SAP in data connectivity. But the question remains: is this shift proven across industries, or still in the hype phase?
Don’t Ignore the “Challengers”
Robin Tunderman from Relex called out the industry’s tunnel vision. He pointed out that Kinaxis, SAP, BY, and o9 are “old-school,” and missing RELEX is doing clients a disservice. He claimed 100% success rate, 62 NPS, 45% CAGR and clearly outperforming Blue Yonder in revenue base,
Those are bold claims. Whether or not Relex is the real deal, Robin’s point is valid: too many buyers default to brand names without evaluating what truly fits their model.
Similarly, Abhishek Bhat mentioned Arkieva - another platform frequently overlooked in Gartner circles but well-regarded in niche applications. And Manolina Saha threw in OMP, cheekily asking for “a little visibility.”
These alternatives deserve a seat at the table, especially when mainstream tools don’t deliver industry-specific results.
When Platform Fit Becomes Organizational Misfit
Imane Bennecim nailed one of the most important - and least discussed - truths: “These platforms are built for complex, large-scale supply chains. Powerful, but heavy on setup and expertise. The real challenge is choosing a solution that matches your actual operational complexity, not just the vision.”
This is where many transformation projects fail. Leadership buys the Cadillac, but the team needs a bicycle.
Simon Eagle, long a critic of traditional planning models, went further: “None of these platforms are adequate for managing material replenishment.” His argument? They’re all still chained to the old MRP + forecast mindset. He advocates for decoupled Lean Pull systems instead of layering more tech on broken logic.
Whether you agree or not, it’s a reminder: a great UI doesn’t fix bad methodology.
The Unsexy Stuff That Matters More Than AI
Several people praised the platforms’ graphical interfaces, AI capabilities, and predictive engines. But none of that matters if:
You’re stuck in a legacy master data mess
Your suppliers aren’t onboarded
Your planners are burned out
Or your IT team is two consultants short of survival
What stood out in the comments was how little discussion there was about actual outcomes. Where were the comments saying “We improved service levels by 18% with Kinaxis,” or “We cut inventory by 10 days using o9”?
Most of the feedback was still tool-centric, not transformation-centric. That should tell us something.
Final Takeaways
Sanket’s post did what few vendor comparison charts do: spark real conversation. And it surfaced five truths supply chain leaders need to hear:
No platform wins on features alone. The right fit is contextual.
Integration is only valuable if your data is clean and your team is trained.
Challengers like Relex, Arkieva, and OMP might be better matches in many cases.
Legacy planning logic is still baked into most tools. Challenge the methodology.
The tech is less important than your organization’s ability to use it well.
Your Move, Supply Chain Leaders
Ask yourself:
Are you buying a platform because of brand recognition, or business fit?
Have you invested more in software than in the people expected to use it?
Do you even need all these features, or just better fundamentals?
The next planning platform decision you make isn’t just a tech investment. It’s a bet on how your supply chain thinks, moves, and learns.
So choose like it matters - because it does.
Continue the conversation on Chain.NET — the global supply chain community where professionals like you exchange ideas, challenge assumptions, and explore smarter solutions for the future. Join us to access exclusive resources, events, and insights that help turn conversations into action.
 | A guest post by
|