Navigating the Geopolitics of Generative AI: A CEO's Guide

How Companies Can Thrive in an AI World Dominated by the US and China—and Why Alternatives Matter

Generative AI (GenAI) is reshaping industries worldwide, but its geopolitical implications are profound and complex. The US and China dominate the GenAI landscape, but a rising group of "middle powers" are beginning to shape the future of this transformative technology. This dynamic creates both challenges and opportunities for global businesses.

This article draws insights from Boston Consulting Group's report, "How CEOs Can Navigate the New Geopolitics of GenAI."

The GenAI Superpowers: US and China

The US currently sets the standard, producing 57% of the world's leading large language models (LLMs). With unmatched access to capital, top talent, and infrastructure, American tech giants like Alphabet, Amazon, and Microsoft continue to define global GenAI standards.

“Nearly 70% of notable AI models since 1950 have emerged from US-based institutions, clearly establishing America's longstanding leadership in AI,” notes Nikolaus Lang, senior partner at BCG.

Meanwhile, China is rapidly closing the gap, leveraging substantial public investment and a vast AI talent pool. Notably, companies like Alibaba and Baidu, alongside innovative startups such as 01.AI, have made significant strides in GenAI capabilities.

“China's government venture capital has invested around $100 billion in AI firms since 2019, dramatically accelerating their GenAI ecosystem,” says Leonid Zhukov, VP of AI at BCG.

Emerging GenAI Middle Powers: EU, Gulf Countries, South Korea, and Japan

European Union: Leveraging Collective Strength

Despite lagging behind in GenAI-specific investment, the EU is tapping into its collective strengths. Promising European startups like France-based Mistral and Germany's Aleph Alpha are creating competitive GenAI models.

“Mistral’s models exemplify European collaboration—designed in France, trained in Italy, and hosted in Swedish data centers,” explains Marc Gilbert, BCG's Global Geopolitics Lead.

The EU’s stringent regulatory environment, including GDPR and the EU AI Act, could paradoxically strengthen its competitive position by creating demand for European-hosted GenAI.

Gulf Nations: Capitalizing on Wealth and Energy

Countries like Saudi Arabia and the UAE, with significant capital resources, are quickly becoming influential in GenAI. UAE’s G42 and Saudi Arabia’s Aramco have already launched impressive regional models.

“Saudi Arabia's PIF and the UAE's sovereign funds are strategically investing tens of billions into AI, underscoring their ambition,” says Zhukov.

Lower electricity costs and government-backed initiatives make these countries increasingly appealing hubs for GenAI infrastructure.

South Korea and Japan: Tech-Driven Potential

Both nations possess strong technology ecosystems but currently lack the scale of the US or China. South Korean firms like Samsung and Naver are rapidly advancing in GenAI, while Japan leverages partnerships between industry and academia, exemplified by its Fugaku-LLM.

“South Korea and Japan must strategically scale their domestic markets and data infrastructure to effectively compete,” advises Gilbert.

Implications for CEOs: Diversifying GenAI Supply Chains

The geopolitical concentration of GenAI supply in the US and China poses significant business risks, from regulatory uncertainties to geopolitical disruptions. CEOs must strategically diversify their GenAI sources to ensure resilient and flexible operations.

Businesses can adopt a portfolio approach by leveraging:

• Diverse regional GenAI models tailored to specific markets.

• A blend of proprietary, open-source, and regionally developed solutions.

“Executives must build geopolitical muscle, anticipating shifts in technology access and regulatory landscapes,” emphasizes Nikolaus Lang.

Future Breakthroughs: The Wildcard

New AI paradigms could disrupt current geopolitical dynamics. Nations historically strong in AI research—such as the UK, Canada, and Israel—could potentially drive breakthroughs that redefine GenAI leadership.

Key Takeaways

• Diversify GenAI Sourcing: Companies should avoid over-reliance on US and Chinese suppliers to manage geopolitical risk.

• Invest Strategically in Regional Hubs: Countries outside the superpower duopoly are viable and strategic options for GenAI partnerships.

Join the Conversation

How is your company addressing the geopolitical complexities of GenAI? Are you diversifying your sources or waiting to see how global dynamics evolve?

Share your strategies and insights in the comments below - we'd love to hear from you.